HISTORICAL and Royal Commission into SAPOL making Biography UGLY HEROS - The price of Unlawful Enforcement.
Gripping accounts of a Regional Underworld. Life in the Shadows of the Elite STARForce team of South Australia Police. Autobiography of Marcia Anita Hobbs, Human Rights Activist, AUSTRALIA.
‘Fear Is The Root Of All Weakness®️’
"Writing and publicly disclosing this autobiography - The Truth, did alleviate some of this reputational damage throughout the year of 2019 into 2020 - many years after the defamation began. Until the self-publication of this book was retracted by In-House Publishing. It was a blessing dressed as a curse, considering the amount of redress that the facts needed, which came about after police force believed they had successfully covered up countless government department sexual crimes. I had paid for the publications print completely by the end of 2020. In 2021 was when the publishing house announced the government was disrupting the publishing of this book. Corruption flourishes when we believe we must behave like sheep and obey illegalities. I strongly disagree with the disruptive behaviour of all of my publishers. The red flag of tyranny flying high for VIP paedophile of Australia. In-House Publishing proprietor – female (wife and owner), stated they were unable to print the book due to the government stopping them. The Federal Australian government at this time was Scumo of Liberal Government - PM Scott Morrison (Born 13MAY1968). The state of Queensland governed under a Labor government led by Annastacia Palaszczuk (Born 25JUL1969). In-House Publishing located in the state of Queensland, myself a South Australian Author. The statement that In-House publishing made that they could not self-publish Ugly Heros, after causing much psychological damage with commentary made via this couple owned, Christian family publication house, during the editing process leading up to this decision evidently involving police forces was a devastating experience. Suspecting the agenda after viewing the publishing houses edit to my autobiography trying to make it at the least defamatory and worst intentionally engaging with the cover up – personally I believe they engaged in the latter. So, I had already submitted this Autobiography to other publishers, for both self-publishing and contracted publication. Forwarding a highly modified and manipulated manuscript worldwide at the end of year 2020 and ongoing until fully vigilantly proofed. The truth was not going to be disrupted on my watch. A blatant disregard for seeking justice and the truth, despite facts being bare for all to see in 2021. In-House Publishing claim a male was also publishing a whistleblowing book with them. I assumed it was a dodgy cop or biker book that had some cool stories but called no one or nothing significant out really. Steven Charles Williams, missing since 2005 from Willaston, South Australia a former president of the Gypsy Joker MC with the only biker book at this time that was naming and shaming the paedophiles. It certainly wasn’t his book of truths that In-House Publishing was talking about. I hoped it was a personal story, public disclosure or for resolution. Free speech is a thing, yet so is due process, whistleblowing government requires official reporting, not just money grabbing and opportunistic exposure by ex-police or ex-military personnel trying to re-write history.
This book made pre-sales prior to its actual final publication. The first 500 pre-order copies to be personally signed by me – whenever the publication printed (if I wasn’t dead from reckless endangerment in criminal negligence). Purchases of this publication guaranteed under my brand Barbwire Noose.
Do Not Conform a moto of my brand Barbwire Noose. Conformity is a key to the communist totalitarian agenda and the more willing you are to walk past indecency, immorality and suffering the better. Like the compliant Nazi's who we all know knew right from wrong. Fear Is The Root of All Weakness.
Regarding the years this book discusses, I am not the only person to whistle blow regarding SAPOL misconduct, criminality and toxic culture. On 2/03/23 a Whistleblower Labels SA Police Force As Toxic. You will now read extracts from this whistleblowing taken from https://southaustraliapolice.com/
The article talks of the toxic leadership of SAPOL Commissioner Grant Stevens and of the internal take regarding SAPOL’s hold over the sex industry of Sth AUS, these officers stem predominately into VICPOL and NTPOL.
Whistleblower articles extract as follows: SAPOL and the Sex Industry
SAPOL also has an intimate (no pun intended) involvement with the prostitution industry, which has long been illegal in South Australia. Curiously, everyone in Adelaide knows where at least one brothel is located, because they are often situated on busy roads and everyone who passes by knows full well what kind of ‘business’ is conducted inside. Yet we are expected to believe the police, with all their detectives, informants and so-called intel, are truly unaware of these establishments? The police are well aware of these brothels, because they extort each and every one. Failure to pay the ‘SAPOL tax’ will result in raids, arrests and other forms of harassment that will ultimately force the business to close.
This is why, when calls to decriminalize prostitution intensified a few years back, SAPOL was the quickest and loudest to object. The reasoning given by Grant Stevens was that decriminalizing brothels would attract “organised criminals”.
But prostitution in South Australia is already under the control of an organised crime group: SAPOL.
The real reason behind SAPOL’s objection was that it was in no mood to lose a lucrative income stream. The officers involved in this racket were no doubt further upset at the possibility of losing the free sexual ‘perks’ involved (i.e. prostitutes forced to provide sexual services to these filthy officers).
So annoyed were SAPOL, they began harassing brothels in order to send a “back off” message. Sex Industry Network general manager Kat Morrison said the “heavy-handed” policing started after a sex work decriminalisation bill passed the Legislative Council in 2017.
“Potentially SAPOL are worried,” said Morrison. “They are potentially worried that the decriminalisation bill is going to pass through Parliament, and that they’re going to be stripped of some of the power that they currently have as gatekeepers of the sex industry.”
In Closing
The author of the anonymous letter is to be commended for taking some sort of stance, unlike most of his spineless colleagues. His primary concern, however, seems to be the effect of SAPOL’s deteriorating environment on officer morale and well-being.
In reality, the real victims are the the unfortunate public whose taxes fund this disgrace of a police force. The public has had to suffer both increasing harassment, revenue-raising and disinterest in real crime – a situation that became visibly worse during the COVID-19 saga.
South Australia Police is a corrupt abomination, and always has been. However, there is no disputing SAPOL’s disinterest in fighting real crime has intensified under the non-leadership of Grant Stevens, whose main concerns would appear to be suppressing criticism of SAPOL, enforcing COVID tyranny as de facto leader of South Australia, and helping implement the dystopian Smart Cities agenda.
That is why he has recently been rewarded with another 5 years as role of commissioner despite widespread dissatisfaction with his performance from within the force.
South Australians deserve better. Much better.
As you read, many issues are addressed in this article (whistle-blower letter) with statement supporting my claims regarding SAPOL significant involvement with organised crime, sex workers and the sex industry – a sex industry that has push minors into and around its operations for years. Decriminalisation without the address of paedophilia within the industry only allows paedophilia to multiply with a tag saying its legal in some way shape or form. I do not agree with decriminalisation of sex work without proper address of law enforcement, government and organised crime addressing the obsession in Australia to pimp out fourteen-year-olds."
Feign public discourse via police ombudsman and ICAC SA reports on SAPOL, malfeasance and criminality side stepping a long-term SAPOL secret of STD’s threats and spreading, contributes to an illusion of transparency in this case. The media easily conflated between accountability and false investigations. Transparency alone is not sufficient to provide accountability in all cases. Especially when confused within national security, free-information, and the exchange of vague facts in an era of information saturation. People with no desire for integrity, love ambiguity, whether it is legislated ambiguity, media ambiguity or regarding police deliberately created ambiguity to confuse and conflate investigations.
A public disclosure is not subject to persecution. An individual is not subject to any civil, criminal, or administrative liability for making a public interest disclosure. Law and Media Reports - Information regarding your criminal case(s) unlikely to be restricted to a formal record check. Any “disclosable court outcome” – including findings of guilt and outstanding criminal charges. Information likely to be disclosed in a National Police Check (NPC) or a Working with Children Check (WCC). Case names are normally listed on websites such as the online court registry, which are freely accessible. Many cases are also ‘reported’, which means the judgments are published in law reports as well as online.’
Furthermore, Public officials (disclosers) who suspect wrongdoing within the Commonwealth public sector can raise their concerns under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (PID Act).
Allegations made under the PID Act are public interest disclosures (PID).
All Australian Government agencies, Commonwealth companies and public authorities have responsibilities under the PID Act to investigate suspected wrongdoing, take appropriate action.
Conduct which may be the subject of a PID includes but is not limited to a contravention of the law, corruption, perverting the course of justice, maladministration, an abuse of public trust, falsifying scientific research, wastage of public money, or conduct that is a danger to health, safety or the environment. (Source: https://www.ombudsman.gov.au).
Anyone can make a disclosure of environmental and health information.
• However, to gain the protections provided under the PID Act, a person who makes a disclosure of environmental and health information:
1. must believe on reasonable grounds that the information is true; or
2. not being in a position to form such a belief, believes on reasonable grounds that the information may be true and is of sufficient significance to justify its disclosure so that its truth may be investigated. (Source Attorney-General’s Department SA Government)."
Under the Australian Consumer Law, businesses must not accept payment for products or services if: they do not intend to supply them.